-
Unknown A
So Elon Musk and Doge are highly suspicious. That's coming from a judge. That's the subject of today's video. And check out this headlines, guys. Judge calls DOJ answers about Musk, Doge Rolel quote, highly suspicious. And this drama keeps unfolding as essentially lawsuits keep pouring in against Trump and Musk and Doge as they try to do lots of unconstitutional and illegal activities. And you know, we get so many insider reports. People are fighting a back against these people. My personal opinion on this stuff is that they must be stressing out like crazy. I told you guys before that they're looking to hire a whole bunch of defense attorneys. That's Trump and Musk. But no reasonable or good lawyer is gonna want to work with these people because essentially you're defending criminals defense in terms of Musk and Trump, they'll go on Joe Rogan and then they'll be Joe Ron will be like, oh, yeah, yeah, you're so smart.
-
Unknown A
Why don't people love you?
-
Unknown B
Right?
-
Unknown A
This is Fox News saying Joe Roganila Musk. Wonder why journalists aren't celebrating Doge. Guys celebrate those that celebrate that they're firing you celebrate that they're lying to you. This kind of stuff. And I want to point this out, I just made a video about Ukraine because sometimes you'll see the stuff on the Internet and I justnna show you what it looks like. This is a Russian bot, Bronco i7z. They say Trump is such an effing legend. Zelenskyy is just a criminal, right? And you look at the when the date of the account was made was on January 3, 2025, new account. You'll see this from time to time when you see sort of these weird generic response to saying Musk is a hero or Trump is a hero, right? Like, it doesn't really exactly relate to the video or anything specific. That's what bot stuff looks like.
-
Unknown A
So I wanted to say, when you see people out there loving Trumps and Mus, you never know. You never know where that stuff's coming from. The Doge stuff is all about cutting government, right? They want to fire many people as they can. And you'll get these kind of headlines. And I want to explain to you, right, so it says meme coins aren't subject to securities regulations, says sec. What? So the basic of it is if you remove regulations, if you fire a bunch of people, they can run their scams. That's what this's all about, right? Isn't this highly suspicious? Obviously, the judge thinks so. Whenever you do call them out, though, because they don't want to necessarily get in trouble with the law, that they're trying to skirt the law as much as they can. They do take precautions. So again, they're trying to hire defense attorneys.
-
Unknown A
This is actually Katie Miller. That's Stephen Miller's wife. So Stephen Miller is one of the we to say it if you want to. Well, I try to be app polit when I make these things, but we'll just say it. He's probably one of the more Nazi type of people on their team, but that's his wife. Trump even went to their wedding. So she's trying to eliminate conflicts of interest. She works for a consulting firm. They advise lots of golf course companies, these kind of things, consumer brands. And basically, if you want influence in the White House, if you want influence with Mus or Trump, you can pay her money or whatever. Right. That's she's a consultant, so she steps down. Actually, they're trying to remove any kind of conflicts of interest. And on top of that, this is sort of what they're trying to do as well as is Rollb Black civil rights era stuff.
-
Unknown A
So be it Department of Labor, be it Social Security, all these things to protect you and make for a more safer and fairer society they want to eliminate. That's what they're up to. So let's read a little bit what the judge has to say regarding Musk. And again, this is about Doge. It says the federal judge overseeing a lawsuit claiming Elon Musk is wielding vast unconstitutional power. That's why we're doing this. We think Elon Musk is wielding vast unconstitutional power to reshape US Government. Said he was, quote, highly suspicious of Trump administration's incomplete explanation of the billionaires s actual role.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
This tells you so everyone has all these questions and then the Trump people try to come up with somewhere to answer. It doesn't really make sense. Your answers are highly suspicious. It's incomplete.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
This is the kind of stuff where we don't know exactly what they're doing. They keep trying to dodge lawsuits by pretending like, oh well, Musk isn't really in charge of it. It's actually this other person.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
It's all smoke and mirrors to sh I Musk from liability. Moore says here US District Judge Theodore Chuang on Friday grilled a US Justice Department lawyer hearing in Maryland about the structure and actions of the Department of Government Efficiency.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
So what are you doing? How's this thing structured? Who's giving the orders this kind of stuff. And again, they're trying to shield Musk. The judge said that while the government had represented in court that Musk isn't the head of Doge. It wasn't offering complete details about his role or who is running the new agency.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
So this is clear that they're trying to protect Musk. Right. He's like, well, okay, so if Musk isn't in charge, who is? That's the question. And so it's interesting to. And I say this again and I'll say it again and again. Again, sure, I understand. If you're a Mus or Trump fanboy fangirl, you watch Joe Rogan, you watch Fox News, you say, oh yeah, yeah, they'always tell the truth. Well, what I have to say about this stuff is like if you're really telling the truth, testify before Congress, give testimony before court, tell it to a judge. Right. That's what really holds water with these kind of people. And I understand you can listen an podcast, they can lie however they want, but try it in front of a judge, try it in front of the Congress and already you can see the judges is calling them out.
-
Unknown A
So that's what we're looking for goes on. And this is actually really interesting to go through the details here. Truang is the latest judge handling some of the legal challenges to President Donald Trump. Executive orders to demand more information about Doge and to raise concerns about the explanations they've been receiving about what Musk and Efficiency Team are doing inside federal agencies. Like, what are you up to? You know, give us more details. And they've been. The Musk and the Trump people have been trying to hide it as much as they can. Chuang didn't immediately rule on whether to grant the plaintiff's request. So the lawsuit is to stop Musk and Trump immediately.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
Stop Musk immediately. So it says he didn't immediately rule to request to bar Musk and do affiliated employees from accessing records at the U.S. agency for International Development or making decisions about the agency personnel or spending. The plaintiffs are current and former US AD employees and contractors. So, and this is one of many agencies or many employees, I guess you could say that are firing or. Sorry, many agencies that are employees that are suing a Musk. Here's some more details of this. The challenges are saying he was head of doge. Chuang told the government lawyer, quote, you're saying he wasn't, but we can't tell who was. Which admittly is highly suspicious.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
That's the quote the judgeges like, okay, so you're saying Musk isn't the head, but who was.
-
Unknown B
Right?
-
Unknown A
You're saying he wasn't, but we can't tell you who was. Which is admittedly highly suspicious. The judge added, I'm not saying that you're not being candid, so you're not necessarily a liar, right? I'm not saying you're not being candid, but just the whole operation, it raises questions. So the judge is being polite, right? That's what judges, you knowus, they go with the law, they go with the facts. That's what you should do and you do call it out, right? So, you know, tell me the truth on this stuff. The White House earlier this week confirmed the identity of the person who's serving as administrative doge, Amy Gleason. But again, this is just a fall person and whether or not she volunteer for this, who knows Youys Amy. I mean this, it's weird because Musk is clearly the head of this thing. He tweets out nonst stop.
-
Unknown A
He, him and Vivek were the names of this stuff. Like, like suddenly they g a different name. Like the way this, I mean you read through the whole arguments that the, you know, Trump people are trying to protect Musk, it just becomes clear they're a bunch of lyers. It't knowher where to put it. And that's why like I said, any of the stuff tell it before judging. The judge is saying your details are incomplete. Also says here after stating court papers that it wasn't must talking about who's head a doge Doge administrator thing. Despite Trump's public statements about putting the billionaire in charge.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
So in public Trump is saying, oh yeah, yeah, Musk is in charge. And then they know submit papers and like o no, no, it's really the other person.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
So that's where you're catching them in the lie. Basically. Musk, the chief executive of Tesla Inc. And the world's richest person, has been public been the public face administration's pushed to slash spendning and the federal workforce. Also this'here Justice Department lawyer Joshua Gardner struggled to directly answer much wrong questions.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
So he's and lawyers right there, they're not stupid. They don't want to necessarily go to prison over this stuff. So they're trying to like, you know, all right, I'll take the 5th though I don't know for sure. I I'll get back to you now that kind of, you know, run around answers. Gardner said he didn't have Information about whether anyone had served as a DOJ administrator before Gleon.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
Because that would be a legitimate question. Like, okay, so if Musk isn't in charge, who's in charge? Okay, so now you're saying this Amy person's in charge. Was she the only person charge? Was she in charge in the beginning? Like, meaning that was Musk in charge, then Amy, then, you know, then now Musk again or whatever, like trying to get a, a chain of events. That's what they're going for. And, and the lawyer, right, for the Trump people's like, Gardner said he didn't have information whether anyone else had served at the DOJA administrator. Right. So he's a saying, I don't know before Gleason and what agencies DOJ affiliate employees detailed to ASAD had come from Chang as the judge asked if Gardner had tried to find out.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
Did, did you ask questions? Did you try to find out if anyone proceeded Gleason saying it seemed like a knowable fact.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
Someone should know. Someone should know this stuff. So the judges is prying on here, right? Asking. Gardner said he had asked. That's the lawyer, the defense lawyer for the Trump and Musk. He didn't specify who he tried to communicate with. So who would you ask?
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
He's like, I asked, but we don't know who you're talking to, but wasn't able to get an answer. So that's the weak defense that they're having here. And that's why I'm going through this whole thing with you guys. It's pretty obvious there's shenanigans going on. You can see it in their defense. You can just see it in, you know, explanations and the incomplete stuff they provide. And essentially when you'reught a lie, you just keep making up more and more stuff. But the lawyer, though, is just basically trying to go like, kind of my, like, okay, how can I answer without answering that essentially what their lawyer is trying to do says you're chuang again, the judge also express frustration with the lack of documentation. The court filings from the government showing who approved recent activity at usaid.
-
Unknown B
Right.
-
Unknown A
Who gave the order? That's what this ends up being. Who gave the order? And I'm telling you guys, you don't want toa be on the wrong side of history of this stuff. I would not be getting involved with Trumper mustk stuff at all. I mean, you can see how they're trying to defend themselves. They just keep trying to be like, oh, and it was. They did it that right. So they're all trying to avoid blame here. That's how these games are played where the top person will give an order and they try to make someone else a fall guy and later pard him. I think that's their plan. But it's a dangerous game. You're dealing with people's lives, you're breaking the law and re you're gonna really hurt a lot of people. So Gardner said that's a lawyer. The gardener said that the Justice Department office that defends administration in court had shrunk by half since November.
-
Unknown A
People are quitting. And now it's trying to keep up with dozens of lawsuits unfolding on fast schedule. So I guess the lawyer like, oh, well, you know, I tried to ask questions but I'm really busy. I'm sorry, I can't do my job. We're just getting sued by so many people can give me more time. Like it's just, it's a song and dance by their lawyers. You guys can see then it says here's Chuang suggested that it was quote part of the problem that the Justice Department in USD didn't have enough people to respond to lawsuits. Well, it's like that's part of the problem. But one of the things I'll say is Musk has pulled this crap off before where they fire a whole bunch of people via Tesla or Twitter. And when the press tries to contact me about more detail the stuff they don't have a communications office.
-
Unknown A
They don't have, you know, anyone to pick up the phone. You know, when in doubt. If you, you know, in their situation, if you don't want to lie, just pretend like you don't hear someone be like, what? What did d you say? I didn't. Sorry, didn't hear. You did repeat the question. Right? It's all the stuff they can t the dodge. I don't know how long they can keep this up. You perbly frank because you know, you're taking off so many people and hurting so many people and people have rights. People are gonna sue you and there's gonna be a lot of lawyers who are gonna want to help people fight for what's right. And there's going toa be very few good lawyers, if any they're going to want to defend Trump us. You do not want to be in the wrong side of history on this.
-
Unknown A
And so that's why even like you know, I mentioned before, the Miller's wife is trying to cover her conflicts of interest stuff. And on top of that you got just more nonsense coming out of this administration. I guess now we're talking about maybe we're go going to attack Mexico for real. This is he. I mean, I could do a whole video on this, but I just wanted to say, like, this is the kind of crazy stuff that we're dealing with. Or Trump keeps want to do tariffs, but they don't have enough competent people and staff. He wants to do, you know, enough all these things like so quickly because you want to analyze, you know, what's this ramification is gonna have. And usually, you know, you take time to plan out your policy, but they're doing things so fast. And then on top of that, the way their game is played is if they do tariffs, then they want to take, you know, bribes, kickbacks or whatever to get exemptions.
-
Unknown A
Like, there'll be some companies like, well, you can you give me exception? And they'll be like, well, what's it worth to you? And that's sort of like, usually we go through someone like a Katie Miller or something of that nature to do these things. So it's interesting to watch all of this stuff play out. It's good though, that the courts are working and appear to be, you know, doing their job. But, you know, I understand the frustration, guys. You want the courts to move faster. I understand that. I mean, I feel the same frustration. I'm just trying to show you there is progress being made. And you can see it. I can see the, the, you know, obvious corruption with Musk. And yes, I would agree it's highly suspicious. You know, he doesn't outright the Justin call outright calling the liar. But it's like, it's like, it's kind of the same where.
-
Unknown A
How do you call someone liar without X using the explicit language? Because you, you know, as a judge is saying, hey, I'll give you the opportunity to show me evidence. And it's kind of like, I guess the best way to describe it from the Musk and Trump point of view is the dog ate my homework. Right? That's kind of ends up being there to fe. So I want to hear your thoughts on any one of these things and I'll catch all on the next video.